1. Whether the Justices of the 1986 Supreme Court "deviation " from clearly established law and
the original meaning of the Constitution violated the substantive due Process rights, Protection
and Guarantees of petitioner Mark A. White and countless American citizens rights of the
Constitution with the Court 's intentional violation of the Fifth and Sixth amendment. When the
court "coined " the term "sentencing factors " which in exchange, removed elements of the
offense as this violation transpired into the unconstitutional and irreconcilable decision of
McMillan v. Pennsylvania. In which Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan, Justice Thomas, Justice
Breyer and The late Justice Ginsberg concurs.

2. Whether the 1986 Supreme Court committed an irreconcilable legal error in their decision of
McMillan v. Pennsylvania and violated the petitioner 's substantive Due Process and affected the
judicial proceedings and outcomes of the American people who were prejudice by this
irreconcilable interpretation of federal law.

3. Whether the petitioner is being illegally detained in federal prison based on the premise of the
district courts poisoned mindset of the irreconcilable reasoning and interpretation of federal law,
which has been deemed unconstitutional.

4. Whether the rationale of the district court 's decision-making has been tainted with judicial
errors that has derived from the 1986 McMillan v. Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision which
has been deemed irreconcilable and cannot be home to our Sixth Amendment Jurisprudence.

Whether the Justices of the 1986 Supreme Court violated the substantive due process rights, protection and guarantees of the petitioner and American citizens