Mausean Carter v. Corizon Health, Inc.
ko (c^V '+U*L lo<*J £v' Courts & rr& r >/o
dfc/ oo^- noe.ei'-t* ie burcJe, 7 oy: e£-fc,bhsh '"^ -ffae nesponcU^)-$
cLt-uh£r*\L£ fnd((^-C&ren {&- /-? «o (a-Ho? £>f- -/-k-e'
60^g-? je-hho^er J>ro-£fe/-eJ pesA^^y c^JL
db-e. 7-e. h-ho^r u>^ e^-h fleet Vc^r oi;c c*/"t meeft cx*1
-h-£.<h{-fne^l- 6ot~ i~Kj r-Z-fvj&J -/^ j>eH~h.o n&dj re-pe^(- /Ycj^j,)-
-/Sr r-ncd)c^f -, // mo^+^s ?E'igbth A^Vndm-t'xd
Ce,-AA^J evicJ-esica
\^t))J d*l-£ lot^jdr Co^ft-S 6r(~or H kotdt'ij -d^-e J'e+rhcn^-^/to/r kurcltn at. e^tjsh^ Cj-oss O^i'tfhc^
S'+t^oJk^ci- U3he^ -Kie ."^€-VrHoo€^ q>^o£H£^r4cl +eS"h^°^
(2€s~4-> €-d @\fick&)G4L pi O O ^ &-n •f^S $vp y>-£ 'f~}'h&~y£'S~_$
cU'«xs ot're±p° -falstfiftoj . fp*£&ci^t med'Ccif
-fo re'Pvcr^ j^hhene^rntxCf r<=,/ */r^ a 7C£ co rd'f'
Whether the lower courts erred in holding that the petitioner did not meet the burden of establishing the respondents' deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and in holding that the petitioner did not meet the burden of establishing the gross negligence standard, when the petitioner provided evidence and certified documents supporting the petitioner's claims