No. 22-6283
James R. Turner v. Federal Aviation Administration, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights district-court-procedure due-process equitable-tolling jurisdiction-dismissal psychiatric-disability standing statute-of-limitations
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals was justified by DISMISSING Petitioner's appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
2. Whether the United States District Court of New York of the Eastern District erred when DISMISSING Petitioner's complaint as untimely against the United States and the Port Authority concluding that Petitioner's affirmation was "not responsive" because he failed to explain how his Psychiatric illness warranted equitable tolling of the Statute of Limitation.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals was justified by DISMISSING Petitioner's appeal for lack of jurisdiction
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent Federal Aviation Administration to respond filed.
2022-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 11, 2023)
Attorneys
Federal Aviation Administration
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
James R. Turner
James R. Turner III — Petitioner