Dalton Alonzo Dixon v. North Carolina, et al.
CONSENT OF CLASS BAJ , idun pardici pacing o^Vernmojal program ?
\\ -(Wa, S^a^orn prt50n>p^on(s) ftrc(L labor a Violation of db<Lin an ran /)
"tfhrWndh Ammdratr^ oP dW Undid S^s Qonsjdo-'/on Sla\feaJ and inVolondao) Servidudd) ?
Llndid Sfefe COkfsTiroTXokfAL " Ci|i a on zen (b exclusive. and kToT ccjaiVakn} \c> dtad of a 5pa{u{ord ' C'd'z^n of dho. OmW dfiW'(t
4 ha\T(L a riQh\ of hpaj * oninanjcd WoVernwindsl pr dhd ^ovemm^d's jurisdiction , and phu'om an naoon ou ro 5 i 05 in sicid a s
so, \/sihp has \bo Onjcd bfeWs Sis^ed and under Arista 1, and/or Arpcii 4, daepon 3, Clause, 2. of dns Undid bWca CGnafdofion TX-fetd cWarafcn du (fom -fordhn Couns ir
Con<Aerc.ial mipU program;an ma\
m agrccmcn-(s rnon rac+Os c j 1 rT ?
% of b) (L
AUac.hmu/A 1 A'2, rOAoPilor _ impiiod CoflAg(\ ( in t,)WtrH \ rio.rk.ro. a Pinry O.nAAom , a \/[kU.]iaqion . Ofynlrac" A a an .tsr\
nPoo jr ho^aK Cnnmop l Au) (\{nh(Anql(| and iAqAjihnallfj fflapipoj r\ hinriin(j AorViTtfrl- j ?\/oUrAari nV u rn
in ^ho. D; iAn| fro. Poao.ral ffiPQMhn \ a,i^ (Vomofrpl CArlo ( 000^(4 a Anrl|/y AyL.fflMfft) i^rt'A Ap C.oifjpr>inifl Am PPrf i-n>rj <?_tS , h-P-Torgn -a (MV parte pal 3,, and_pnVaU. incWicW_per sofi, dorn.ir.ilcc ^0 nP 4bo Onion . ^or.lrmAQ \\\% Lr hor_... j. r Lnanri -t>o.?
a fn a Common 3_\AcMiqQ_G: M on Ag a" im + lac^ ? i! ;
bp -mo unit on T^fernmimps) nprlor ^Arpcm , ^WpoG R , P]fai)AO_ ~17 nP 4ho 1 Jn^o
Whether the statutory presumption of consent when participating in a government program violates the Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition on slavery and involuntary servitude