No. 22-6274
John C. Killingbeck v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights content-provider criminal-procedure criminal-prosecution due-process free-speech habeas-corpus internet-immunity internet-service-provider-liability section-230 standing
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
What is the correct way for the Government to correct its prosecution and answer as in etc.
Are the Government and courts acting within their
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government and courts have acted within their constitutional authority in prosecuting and denying relief to an individual convicted of downloading 'illegal content' from internet newsgroups
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 9, 2023)
Attorneys
John Killingbeck
John C. Killingbeck — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent