No. 22-6254
Aaron Michael Murray v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial impartiality-standard judicial-ethics judicial-impartiality judicial-recusal media-bias media-coverage recusal
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether numerous local and national media reports, which brought facts to light that have caused the public to question the district court's impartiality in favor of the government, would objectively cause a criminal defendant to have a well-founded fear that he will not receive fair adjudication of his case at the hands of that judge in the future?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal defendant's due process right to a fair trial is violated when numerous media reports raise reasonable questions about a district court judge's impartiality
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 9, 2023)
Attorneys
Aaron M. Murrray
Aaron Michael Murray — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent