No. 22-6251
Onofre Tommy Serrano v. California
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appointment-of-counsel civil-rights conflict-of-interest constitutional-rights due-process judicial-review medical-treatment reasonable-time-to-consult right-to-counsel
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Why did the Court of Appeal court issue a pro-forma component, 0902, in Appel v. National, that Appellant could not file a defendant's request-Auth to court?
2. Does the state of Appeal court control for 302 day's third in Appellant's Court and to court, via contract of interest?
3. Does the appellate court provide for a transfer of the case via drug in Kecia Houses?
4. Is a critical issue at Appel's Court-interest as in the Respondent in the trial court?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court has a prompt duty to appoint counsel once indigency attaches
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-11-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2023)
Attorneys
Onofre Tommy Serrano
Onofre Tommy Serrano — Petitioner