No. 22-625
W.A. Griffin v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment probable-cause qualified-immunity search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration ERISA JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-03-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the state of Georgia's mandatory provider assignment of benefit law drafted under Insurance Title 33 (Georgia § 33-24-54) is preempted by the Employee Retirement Investment Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA").
Whether the Supreme Court case, Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, 141 S. Ct. 474 (2020), overruled Physicians Multispecialty Group and voids ERISA preemption of O.C.G.A. § 33-24-54 if the provider has a written assignment of benefit.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures
Docket Entries
2023-03-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
2023-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc. to respond filed.
2022-12-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2023)
Attorneys
Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc.
Lindsey B. Mann — Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Respondent
W.A. Griffin
W. A. Griffin — Petitioner