No. 22-6244

LeeAnn Morgan v. Regents of the University of California, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-12-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 7th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights fraud-concealment jury-trial medical-battery private-party seventh-amendment state-funded-medical-institution writ-of-error-coram-nobis
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Does the 7th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provide that a Jury Trial
be held in civil private matters between a private party and a State-funded
medical Institution?

2. Does a Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis - a long-held, common-law
doctrine in California - lie as a remedy for a plaintiff s recovery, for a trial
Court to:
a) Vacate a prior, erroneous judgment in a naively-filed medical
"negligence " action, and
b) To order a fairly-conducted jury trial, based upon newly discovered
facts obtained long after the original action ended: facts which indicate that
the matter falls under the various laws of:
1) Concealed medical battery;
2) Fraud / fraudulent concealment;
3) Violations of the False Claims Act;
4) Violations of Unfair Competition Law;
5) Violations of Stark Anti-kickback Act;
6) Violations of several California Primary Rights during a surgery;
7) Violations of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act;
8) Violations of the Declaration of Helsinki;
9) Violations of FDA and ICH regulations; and
10) Violations of the Nuremburg Code (concealed human
experimentation)?

3. Does California Code of Civil Procedure Section 657 also lie as a statutory
remedy in the trial court for a plaintiffs recovery under the same medical
battery fact pattern as in #2 above?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the 7th Amendment provide for a jury trial in civil private matters between a private party and a state-funded medical institution?

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-08
Waiver of right of respondent The Regents of the Univ. of CA, et al. to respond filed.
2022-11-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2023)

Attorneys

LeeAnn Morgan
LeeAnn Morgan — Petitioner
The Regents of the Univ. of CA, et al.
Kenneth R PedrozaCole Pedroza LLP, Respondent