1. Did the ruling(s), by disregarding testimony of material witness, proven to lie
under oath violated petitioner 's right to due process enshrined in fourteenth
amendment.

2. Did the ruling(s) disregard a material witness 's testimony proving fabricated
evidence, violated petitioner 's right of due process, equal protection under
the law, by fourteenth amendment rights.

3. Did the ruling(s), disregard violation of fifth amendment 's rights of the
petitioner, and due process when a detective as a material witness; admitted
under oath to obtain a coerced confession and destroyed an earlier voluntary
statement.

4. Did BPOA, not err but acted with malice and impunity, to flagrantly violate
petitioner 's fifth, fourteenth amendments and Due process of the law.

5.

6. Did the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court ignore flagrant violations by
BPOA by Affirmation of BPOA order.

7. Did, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania by its order, ignored violations of
fifth, fourteenth and due process of law guaranteed under the
Constitution of the United States.

Did the ruling(s), by disregarding testimony of material witness, proven to lie under oath violated petitioner's right to due process enshrined in fourteenth amendment