No. 22-6220
Martin Robert Moncada-Aguirre v. United States
Tags: alleyne almendarez-torres appellate-procedure apprendi certiorari constitutional-interpretation criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review sentencing supreme-court-precedent
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (20183)
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-12-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 4, 2023)
Attorneys
Martin Robert Moncada-Aguirre
Judy Fulmer Madewell — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent