No. 22-6217
Tags: adequate-defense ake-v-oklahoma constitutional-rights due-process expert-assistance juvenile-offender juvenile-sentencing mental-health mental-health-expert miller-v-alabama sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
This petition presents the following question: whether the "basic tools of an adequate defense" include expert assistance in "evaluation, preparation, and presentation" of a defense at sentencing premised on the age of the juvenile defendant and where the court and the State have put his mental state at issue.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 'basic tools of an adequate defense' include expert assistance in 'evaluation, preparation, and presentation' of a defense at sentencing premised on the age of the juvenile defendant and where the court and the State have put his mental state at issue
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-12
Waiver of right of respondent Montana to respond filed.
2022-12-05
Motion (22M38) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2022-11-09
MOTION (22M38) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-10-26
Motion (22M38) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2022-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 4, 2023)
2022-09-09
Application (22A213) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 26, 2022.
2022-09-07
Application (22A213) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 26, 2022 to October 26, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Montana
Roy Lindsay Brown — Montana Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Steven Wayne Keefe
John Robert Mills — Phillips Black, Inc., Petitioner