REVIEW POINT I: Whether Petitioner 's Health, Safety and Welfare were
protected and attentive while living in unsafe housings particular contaminated
with mold.

REVIEW POINT II: Whether the Supreme Court of Florida and other courts
erred in not applying next step rules, statues and citations of authorities in their
Denied decisions, partly and not entirely to the Petitioner 's specific requests,
motions and petitions, etc.

REVIEW POINT III: Whether, the outcome of any Court 's decisions, specifically
involving health safeness deserves Rehearing. The basis of Rehearing a question of
great public importance. (See Fla.R. App. P 9.120 and 9.210)

Whether Petitioner's health, safety and welfare were protected while living in unsafe housing contaminated with mold