A. WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY DISMISSING MR. GALLION'S MERITORIOUS ARGUMENT THAT THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR BY DISREGARDING THE GUIDELINE RANGE OF 51-63 MONTHS AND IMPOSING A SENTENCE OF 120 MONTHS AND REFUSING TO ADDRESS THE SENTENCE CREDIT GUIDANCE OF U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3.

B. WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT'S JUDGMENT IMPOSING CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT REFERENCED BUT DID NOT ORALLY PRONOUNCE SUCH CONDITIONS DURING THE SENTENCING HEARING.

Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred by dismissing Mr. Gallion's meritorious argument that the district court committed reversible error by disregarding the guideline range and imposing a sentence of 120 months and refusing to address the sentence credit guidance