No. 22-6202
Peter Gakuba v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure exclusionary-rule grand-jury grand-jury-indictment jurisdiction jurisdictional-error privacy-protection statutory-rape video-privacy-protection-act void-judgment vppa-violation
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Gakuba's criminal indictment for 'statutory rape' was void ab initio due to the Illinois police and prosecutors' violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988 ("VPPA") when they identified Gakuba via his Hollywood Video customer records without the required legal process, thereby depriving all courts of jurisdiction over the case.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Gakuba's criminal indictment was void due to violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-06
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois Prisoner Review Board to respond filed.
2022-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Illinois Prisoner Review Board
Peter Gakuba
Peter Gakuba — Petitioner