No. 22-6186
Michael Andrew Jace v. Ronald Davis, Warden
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-deadlines civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure habeas-corpus look-through-presumption post-conviction-relief rule-60b time-limits
Latest Conference:
2023-04-14
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is Rule 60(b) available as a means of providing relief to an individual who missed the appellate deadlines in Rule 4(a)(1) and Rule 4(a)(5)?
2. Can the State rebutt the "look through" presumption without having fully adjudicated the case?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is Rule 60(b) available as a means of providing relief to an individual who missed the appellate deadlines in Rule 4(a)(1) and Rule 4(a)(5)?
Docket Entries
2023-04-17
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-16
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-11-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2023)
2022-09-13
Application (22A222) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until November 21, 2022.
2022-09-01
Application (22A222) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 22, 2022 to November 21, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Michael Jace
Michael Andrew Jace — Petitioner