No. 22-6179
Brandon J. Office v. Marcus Myers
IFP
Tags: charging-document constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus illegal-sentence motion-to-correct sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Was the Petitioner entitled to Habeas Corpus Relief, where the Petitioner properly raised a Motion to Correct an Illegal Sentence ?
2. Was the Petitioner entitled to Habeas Corpus Relief, where the Petitioner 's sentence is invalid and illegal, where it rest upon the improper "amendment " of a null and void charging document?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Petitioner entitled to Habeas Corpus Relief?
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 30, 2022)
Attorneys
Brandon Office
Brandon J. Office — Petitioner