No. 22-6178
Jason Baxter v. Joseph E. Bradley
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process federal-regulations jurisdictional-dispute notice rules standing state-rights supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Why Was Petitioner Denied Due Process of Law of The Fourteenth Amendment?
(2) Why Was Respondent Allowed To Rescind Certain Contested Documents Without Verifying Statements On Those Documents?
(3) Why Was The Respondent's Allowed To Ignore State Law's?
(4) Why Was Respondent's Allowed a Procedural Violation, Court Lacked Competent's Writ Duly Issued?
(5) Why Does The Court Elas Convene Bailees Motion On Cases In The Labelled, Reversed Handed Who Abatless?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the rules of notice denied due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment?
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-20
Waiver of right of respondent Joseph E. Bradley to respond filed.
2022-07-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 30, 2022)
Attorneys
Jason Baxter
Jason Baxter — Petitioner
Joseph E. Bradley
Andrea Oser — Office of the New York State Attorney General, Respondent