1. Appeal from originating case from the case No. 2:19-cr-20065-lmsn Appealed to the case No. 21-6064 Affirming Aggrivated Identity theft ason record with the clerk's office in originating case.?

2. That petitioner rights has been violated per clerk record filed with the Tennessee Department of Title 42 section 1983 on court Commerce and Insurance.?

3. Petitioner right per file on record of Writ of Mandamus for jury of his own peers.?

4. That said lower courts have ignored Rule 60(b) lack of having personal Jurisdiction?

5. Courts have not answered INTERROGATORIES as per FRCP?

6. That said courts opinion are based on all heresay evidence?

7. That the United States Attorney Office have frauded the Court record in petioners Affidavit Of Truth and as explained on filed with the clerk of Court Office?

Whether the lower courts erred in affirming the conviction for aggravated identity theft, in violation of the petitioner's civil-rights, due-process, and right to a jury of his peers