} i>£» if"c\base piroeett av\<\ vVoletiicrvi o4- Pc\i-hcme-rt£>
H4-U Ame^mcnl Coi^bb^birviei I Du
FceHtrwsf | R_u It^s, o-f Cin ion i nei |a\r\
<=- Eiijhhs f ^iolci-hav)
fVE>o«du&'C' E-ulc- C=>(eO ^vod £-uleJ^~ibirP*z>S<aoatt>»<5 it) 4z\\£&£\ rand jury .subpoof'-K^.s USHoet
dtedwV Ccruirb "hoed Ccru^i SubpOoot^ 4o compel WibooskSess^fb
tf\4bnd p*^Pd coni^enc^ «ne) +o c^ll<r<rf cadence l*
*+?? Conw cY fbbrho-nor' t wloido *Urn\cd SWi'bs Dfeiweb C^uri -fbv^
+iie D 13-booi Ctf~u^i of Ptaw^ii S^iochovied ?
^2-3-Should Pebhcmet- -boon bo allowed Under Federal £ulr€> of
Criminal Prucc<\ ure- Rul-o U "ho wi+hdrcuV her- plc<ci uf4e*- ■fimdmn
OU p^ wk>^ «chc* m -fnlcc^nd .
peeing <A3 Pchbo-vic^ i/v^i3 wndcr +bo misb*l^ n Udiof
p^cercu-feKs held olotnmed docurneio-bary cmdeince- le^||w
'fe"' ^ Ju* hcrplcm , t3 y.
t&) -Sbc-u^ bhero €,Uppi^£.»frV)
by C-ioircmnirtnent +hrtrvi«nh -hake <ara^ iury -Subpocn^-S
of ivrvdic+rronb cfwc -bu ob^-atoui tjovector, 0ynf conduei 4h«b
vtclet^ "ei roe^n^cd 3-tebu-tery or c<yv^b4vhov«M n-f*."?
Urufcd -S-M-eg. m Cheipmetn , 52i4 P *>d 10^-6, logs C^ +i? Cth 200a),of- 4-he. rndtr^ce obbumccl
or dusw\u5se?il

Whether the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii sanctioned the abuse of process and violation of the Petitioner's Fifth Amendment Constitutional Due Process Rights, Violation of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 6(e) and Rule 17 for prosecutors to create false grand jury subpoenas using district court trial court subpoenas to compel witnesses to attend pre-trial conferences and to collect evidence in order to convict Petitioner