Whether a person(s), who lacks the financial resources to hire an attorney, and because of their handicap, disability cannot comply with a court rule(s), are protected by the guarantee of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Constitutional Amendment,

Whether, "Does the Constitutional Amendments guarantees also apply to a black woman, Plaintiff... And, is pursuant to the Constitutional Amendments of the United States of America, Plaintiff entitled to, (1) Due Process, and to (2) Equal Protection of the Law... "

Whether the decision of the U.S. District Court of New Jersey, to grant Respondent Motion for Summary Judgement, when all Petitioner Discovery Request were not granted and or denied, will reset precedence established in Anderson v. Liberty, Inc., 477 US 242 (1986), Celotex Corp. V. Catrett 477 US 317 (1986), and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56, will cause significant conflict with other Circuits, and the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Further, whether the non-granting/denial of Discovery is a violation of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Constitutional Amendment.

Whether a person(s) with a handicap or disability are protected by the Due Process Clause