Whether the California courts' unreasonable refusal to hold an evidentiary hearing on petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, combined with the prosecution's failure to present sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction and trial counsel's failure to investigate and present exculpatory evidence, expert testimony on memory and taint, and the cumulative effect of these errors rendering the trial fundamentally unfair, violates the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

Whether the prosecution presented sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction