1. Whether being in federal custody is a substantial denial of Richard Daniels ' constitutional right of liberty, without "sufficient cause, " without compelling reasons for the United States Congress to proscribe marijuana as a dangerous substance, to be a drug trafficking crime, therefore without due process of law in violation of Amendments IV and V of the Constitution of the United States and is unconstitutional.

2. Whether the exceptional circumstance is the above question has never been decided by this Court.

Whether being in federal custody for marijuana-related offenses is a substantial denial of constitutional liberty without due process