No. 22-6138
Michael Lindell Teasley v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-rights court-of-appeals criminal-procedure district-court due-process eighth-circuit equal-protection judicial-discretion non-violent-offenses sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
bh pid the Gort of pepeals fp the Eight Cikwuit, South cn Piswier oF Towa, abuse its diduetin by vhlizing the Cer wero Feendeg guidelines, whi dh phimes had @ policy 875 agreement With namely the dishicé wuts filae fo Ueterentiate between Cac eee orfandeas With non-violent convickons 2
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, South on Piswier of Iowa, abused its discretion by violating the Cera Feendeg guidelines, which the petitioner had a policy 875 agreement with, namely the district court's failure to differentiate between violent and non-violent convictions
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 22, 2022)
Attorneys
Michael Lindell Teasley
Michael Lindell Teasley — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent