No. 22-6131
Andrew Guy Moret v. Poornima Ranganathan, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process government-standard legal-procedure malpractice-standard medical-malpractice medical-professionals mental-health professional-liability qualified-immunity state-standards
Latest Conference:
2023-03-03
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the standard for mental health professionals to receive qualified immunity is higher, lower, or the same as other medical professionals?
II. Whether there should be a malpractice standard for government staffed, state to require qualified pleaded Doctors, moreover?
III. Whether the Court should opine on products/procedures varying to from state to state?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the standard for mental-health professionals to receive qualified immunity is higher, lower, or the same as other medical professionals?
Docket Entries
2023-03-06
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
2023-02-02
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent Poornima Ranganathan, et al. to respond filed.
2022-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 22, 2022)
2022-08-03
Application (22A97) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 4, 2022.
2022-07-28
Application (22A97) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 5, 2022 to December 4, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Andrew Moret
Andrew G. Moret — Petitioner
Poornima Ranganathan, et al.
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent