No. 22-6130
Darvill Jimmy Joseph Bragg v. United States
Tags: categorical-approach circuit-split criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing gonzales-v-duenas-alvarez mens-rea sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation taylor-v-united-states
Latest Conference:
2023-03-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether plainly overbroad statutory language is sufficient to establish a prior state conviction is broader than the generic definition of a criminal sentencing enhancement provision?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether plainly overbroad statutory language is sufficient to establish a prior state conviction is broader than the generic definition of a criminal sentencing enhancement provision?
Docket Entries
2023-03-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-03-03
Reply of petitioner Darvill Bragg filed.
2023-02-22
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-01-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 22, 2023.
2023-01-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 23, 2023 to February 22, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-12-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 23, 2023.
2022-12-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 22, 2022 to January 23, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 22, 2022)
Attorneys
Darvill Bragg
Heather Rae Quick — Federal Public Defender Office - Iowa, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent