No. 22-6126
Jeffrey Salt v. Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-contempt civil-procedure due-process fifth-amendment intellectual-property non-party non-party-injunction trademark trademark-dispute
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Trademark
DueProcess FifthAmendment Trademark
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Were Jeffrey Salt's fifth amendment due process rights violated when the District Court, in a federal civil trademark case between two corporations, ruled that he was bound by an injunction and subject to imprisonment for civil contempt as a non-party, after denying him entry into the case as a party, thereby prohibiting him from asserting his individual right to disputed intellectual property?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did Jeffrey Salt's Fifth Amendment due process rights violate when the District Court ruled he was bound by an injunction and subject to civil contempt as a non-party?
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-06
Waiver of right of respondent Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. to respond filed.
2022-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 21, 2022)
Attorneys
Jeffrey Salt
Joseph A. Vita — Joseph A. Vita Law Office, Petitioner
Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc.
Jason Libou — Wachtel Missry LLP, Respondent