No. 22-6124

Jason Baxter v. Harold D. Graham, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2022-11-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: compulsory-process confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process right-to-counsel right-to-public-trial
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

WHY WAS BAXTER DENIED THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW BY WAY OF BEING TRIED IN ABSENTIA AT TRIAL?

WHY DID THE JUDICIAL SPILLOVER EFFECT OF BEING RE-INCARCERATED VIOLATE THE U.S. STATE CONSTITUTION?

WHY WAS BAXTER NOT PERSONALLY PRESENT AT FINAL DECREE?

WHY WAS BAXTER NOT ALLOWED TO RETAIN COUNSEL?

WHY WAS THE COURTROOM CLOSED?

WAS A VERDICT OR JUDGMENT RENDERED OR BACKED?

WHEN DID A MAGISTRATE STATE THE EVIDENCE?

THEN DURING TRIAL BECAME AN UNLAWFUL WITNESS FROM THE BENCH?

DID THE TRIAL JUDGE HELD MATERIAL EVIDENCE IN BAXTER'S ABSENCE?

WHY WAS THE TRIAL JUDGE ALLOWED TO PRECLUDE BAXTER FROM OBJECTION? AND DISSENT FOR CAUSES IN AN INVIDIOUS DISCRIMINATORY MANNER?

WHY DID THE STENOGRAPHER-DELIBERATELY DESTROY THE PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS? TO COVER-UP ALL THESE U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS?

WHY WAS THE ADA ALLOWED TO WITHHOLD EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE?

WHY WAS DEFENCE COUNSEL "ONCE" UPON DEFENDANT BAXTER AS WELL AS GROSSLY INEFFECTIVE? WHY DID THE DEFENCE COUNSEL NEVER MAKE AN OBJECTION DURING A WEEK LONG TRIAL?

WHY WAS BAXTER DENIED POST-CONVICTION RELIEF?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's due process rights were violated in the criminal proceedings against him

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-08
Waiver of right of respondent Harold D. Graham to respond filed.
2022-08-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 21, 2022)

Attorneys

Harold D. Graham
Jason R. RichardsOffice of the District Attorney, Nassau County, Respondent
Jason Baxter
Jason Baxter — Petitioner