WHETHERR APPEALS BY SUBSTITUTING FINALITY FOR RIPENESS A RULE IN PROCEEDING IMPLICATING FRAUD UPON THE COURT BY THE GOVERNMENT AND ERSTWHILE DEFENSE COUNSEL, COYREEN FERRENTINE, MAY HAVE ABUSED ITS DISCRETION PURSUANT TO THE COLLATERAL ORDER DOCTRINE UNDER COHEN V. BENEFICIAL INDUSTRIAL LOAN CO., 337 U.S. 6 OF 10

Whether appeals by substituting finality for ripeness in a proceeding implicating fraud upon the court by the government and erstwhile defense counsel may have abused its discretion pursuant to the collateral order doctrine under Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Co., 337 U.S. 541 (1949)