No. 22-6116
Edmund Lowell Fields v. Chandler Cheeks
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-procedure complainant-access constitutional-provisions due-process great-writ habeas-corpus judicial-malfeasance judicial-misconduct judicial-review standing statutory-provisions
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-02-24
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
SHOULD THE COMPLAINANT BE DENIED ACCESS TO THE GREAT WRIT BECAUSE OF JUDICIAL MALFEASANCE?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
SHOULD THE COMPLAINANT BE DENIED ACCESS TO THE GREAT WRIT BECAUSE OF JUDICIAL MALFEASANCE?
Docket Entries
2023-02-27
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-01-27
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-01
Waiver of right of respondent Acting Warden Fredeane Artis to respond filed.
2022-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 21, 2022)
Attorneys
Acting Warden Fredeane Artis
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Edmund Lowell Fields
Edmund L. Fields — Petitioner