No. 22-6109
Dustin Wayne Randall v. United States
Tags: circuit-split criminal-law criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process non-indigent-defendant special-assessment statutory-construction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2023-03-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
The question presented is whether 18 U.S.C. § 3014, once triggered by a qualifying conviction, requires a non-indigent defendant to pay a single additional special assessment in "an amount of $5,000" or pay $5,000 for every qualifying conviction.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 3014 requires a non-indigent defendant to pay a single additional special assessment of $5,000 or $5,000 for every qualifying conviction
Docket Entries
2023-03-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-02-17
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-01-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 17, 2023.
2023-01-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 18, 2023 to February 17, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-12-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 18, 2023.
2022-12-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 19, 2022 to January 18, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2022)
Attorneys
Dustin Randall
Amy B. Cleary — Federal Public Defender, District of Nevada, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent