I. Should BArker v. Wing0's, 407 U.5.S14, 92 S.Ct. 2182.33L.EL.2d 101 (1972) FOur FACtOrS iN determing when An Accused Right to A Speedy triAl hAs beeN violated be Overruled ANd giveN A More precise Method/Guide iN protecting A de FendANt's ConstitutioNAl Due process Right?

HAs the State of Mississippi Eroded the United stats Supreme Coust's Barker v. Wingo's Balancing-test ANAlysis by requiriNg Affirmatiee demoNstrAtioN Of All Four FActors As the touchstoNe For providing AdeNiAl of ConstitutioNAl Right o A Speedy trial thAt A Showing thAt All FActors did Not weigh in defeNdANt's favOr WAs esseNtial to establish a Speedy triAl VlolAtion?

Should the Barker v. Wingo four-factor test for determining speedy trial violations be overruled and replaced with a more precise method?