1. Did the Supreme Court of California violate murder victim Henry Chow 's and
his children their Fourteenth Amendment rights of "life, liberty, and property ",
and equal protection under the Constitution by supporting Justices Perluss,
Segal, and Feuer in their violation of Article 6, Clause 2 of Constitution in their
denial of Henry Chow 's rights to life and bodily autonomy by advocating the
right to euthanasia under Medicare and depriving us of Survivorship rights.
page 10 [firstparagraph] • "...Defendant 's treatment of Decedent constituted
'intentional murder* as opposed to negligence, whether conduct of DpfpnHgnt 'q
staff caused Decedent 's death. ... and taking Decedent off the vent.ilatnr are
irrelevant... " ?

2. Did California 's highest court participate in Domestic Terrorism pursuant to 18
USC §2331(5) by upholding the Lower Courts ' orders legalizing Henry 's forced
death by deliberately unplugging his life support for 21 hours by Defendants
Verity Health Systems of California and its employees, Leyba, Lopez,Vue, and
Markovic for Lower Courts claimed Defendants had legal right within medical
practice to "taking Decedent off the ventilator " constitutes "acts dangerous to
human life" meet domestic terrorism definition of "(5) the term "domestic
terrorism " means activities that— (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that
are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B)
appear to be intended?

3. Did Supreme Court of California commit seditious conspiracy in violation of 18
US. Code §2384 in gratifying Orders to legalize Henry Chow 's euthanasia, since
Opinion [Page 10] states^ "intentional murder* as opposed to negligence, whether
conduct of Defendant 's staff caused Decedent 's death, and ... talcing Decedent off
the ventilator are irrelevant " and dismissed Verity Health Systems of California
in flagrant violation of 42 Code of Federal Regulations § 482.12 that holds
"governing body " legally responsible?

Did the Supreme Court of California violate murder victim Henry Chow's and his children's Fourteenth Amendment rights