No. 22-6062
Thomas Walter Gillen v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: anti-riot-act circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-law due-process federal-appellate-courts first-amendment free-speech severability statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the difference of opinion between the Fourth Circuit and the Ninth Circuit as to the constitutionality of "organize" within the context of the Act is a matter requiring resolution by the Court.
2. Whether the constitutionally infirm provisions of the Act are severable sufficiently to sustain petitioner's conviction under the Act.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the difference of opinion between the Fourth Circuit and the Ninth Circuit as to the constitutionality of 'organize' within the context of the Act is a matter requiring resolution by the Court
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2022)
Attorneys
Thomas Gillen
David Anthony Eustis — Eustis & Graham, PC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent