Christine Owens v. Mahershal Simonet
1.) Should have Mahershal Simonet been placed into custody by Justice William C. Redmond because, petitioner, Christine Owens needed to file a Temporary Restraining Order against him for eluding his participation in a human trafficking onboarding process?
2.) Was the Appellate court with special duty to respond to opening up a criminal investigation against A10 Capital LLC Executive, JERRY E. DUNN, for massive human trafficking, after being presented as a fraudulent Paycheck Protection Program Lender and also formed a company called AVIATION SECURITIZATION which translates the intention and creates imagery to secure aircraft purposed to fly a PPP trafficked victim at the bottom of a commercial flight?
3.) Was the California Supreme Court with a social responsibility to assign a lawyer to Case Number S275429 being that the assignment of an attorney is in fact within their judicial diagram upon knowledge trafficked victims have increased from 26 Million to 28 Million according to the Guardian Organization and petitioner, Christine Owens, is a paid-for, SLAVE UNCAPTURED ?
Should Mahershal Simonet have been placed into custody?