Jane Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, et al.
JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the federal court of appeals should be allowed:
• to criminally "dismiss " the strikingly meritorious appeal that presents
such questions as violations of the statutory law, the US Supreme
Court 's precedents, the Federal Rules, the Constitution, the code of
conduct for federal judges, etc. as "frivolous; "
• to criminally barricade access to "courts " to Petitioner and deprive her
of all legal and constitutional rights through crime, deceit, and
perversions of the procedure, law, rules, and facts;
• to deceive the public, including regarding the contents of the
Petitioner 's filings;
• to pervert and disregard the law, procedure, and all the facts in order to assist with the crimes against Petitioner and the cover-ups while
operating under the color of law.
Whether the federal court of appeals should be allowed to criminally dismiss the strikingly meritorious appeal