By granting the evidence - supported motion for inordinate delay [Appt-D, Dist Doc. 126], the Northern District of Illinois found that the state attorneys and court reporter actions in falsifying the trial transcript to include the criminal allegations now appearing to be V.Wis (He accuses) direct trial testimony, and Post Conviction Assistant States Attorney (PCA ASA") Colleen Gr thn, who sat 2nd chair on the state's trial team, and established the help of conflicted Assistant Public Defender- (APD) Fason Streleci and five State doctors to falsely have me deemed until > invented a process to have my petitions dismissed on "Santilness" grounds where no such olism seal process exists under laws, found that they did so in an effort to conceal the transcript falsification crimes from the courts, and then the district court erroneously adjudicated the habeos claims (and cleared relief) a per the Knowing l, Falsified trial transcript instead of applying the per se prejudice and injunction IAG no farther as required for cases of intentional tampering with the trial court record's.

Question ONE. Did the Northern district of Illinois, so depart from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, and did the Seventh Circuit somehow such departure by denying a Certificate of Appealability, so as to call fonda exercise of this Court's Supremacy Power, where the district court knowingly adjudicated the habeos claims and denied relief on the basis of the trial transcript it had already ruled so grossly falsified + and where the district court opinion operates to bury the state actors' crimes in the Will County Court that if already found occurred, thereby concealing the already found public corruption from the public, bar and courts?

Question Presented