No. 22-5997
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing criminal-verdict cross-examination due-process evidence fair-trial identification legal-sufficiency second-degree-offense weight-of-evidence
Latest Conference:
2022-12-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. (Louv'V sP^eVna\ decision on Kocin(|ue'2_C.Xcie 'rv\-\^icMvorv) ArA SancAoVS. I (oSe c£pnoc Cr\'or ve5 > arA &c,\s on. CroSS-exannr n<3'bork) 9veso\4 \a AVte. QaAore c£ OeifenAan-t Aorecieue a r&vrAr/al ?
2. U)aS Abator^ VerAvcA boVh again s-VAbecoeigVA o? Abe, e.'J^^enc^. anA, (egally insuAflc/enA ?
3. bA Abe_ People. £&\l Ao "prove beyond a /Reasonable. 2)ou/r/- -/-Aa-/ Abe AppeUanA- sbou\<A be. 5en4enced as a $eco*\<\ QeAorvJ o£fen<W7
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the trial court's decision on Rodriguez's identification and use of other crimes and bad acts on cross-examination result in the denial of a fair trial?
Docket Entries
2022-12-12
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.
2022-11-21
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2022-10-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 7, 2022)
Attorneys
New York
Steven A. Bender — Westchester District Attorneys Office, Respondent
Tarence Kirkland
Tarence Kirkland — Petitioner