No. 22-5993
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (10)IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment preponderance-of-evidence reasonable-doubt sentencing sentencing-guidelines substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure
FifthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2023-06-29
(distributed 10 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does a judge deny a defendant's Fifth Amendment rights by increasing a prison sentence based on disputed facts the Court did not find beyond a reasonable doubt, but for which the sentence would be stricken as substantively unreasonable on appeal?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a judge deny a defendant's Fifth Amendment rights by increasing a prison sentence based on disputed facts the Court did not find beyond a reasonable doubt, but for which the sentence would be stricken as substantively unreasonable on appeal?
Docket Entries
2023-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2023.
2023-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-05-09
Rescheduled.
2023-04-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-03-27
Rescheduled.
2023-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-10
Reply of petitioner Malik Ross filed.
2023-03-01
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-01-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 1, 2023.
2023-01-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 30, 2023 to March 1, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-12-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 30, 2023.
2022-12-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 29, 2022 to January 30, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-11-29
Response Requested. (Due December 29, 2022)
2022-11-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.
2022-11-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 5, 2022)
2022-08-28
Application (22A179) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until October 31, 2022.
2022-08-16
Application (22A179) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 1, 2022 to October 31, 2022, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Malik Ross
Beverly A. Beimdiek — Office of the Federal Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent