Kenneth Wilbert Brown v. Brad Adams, Warden
HabeasCorpus
1) How can a defendant be deemed not to have "Been pursuing his rights dilligently ," when he is actively litigating 3 cases simultaneously that are all intrisicly related to one another?
2) Can almost a decade of reliable communication and sound advice, a precedent that makes "attorney assusrances" more than "garden variety"?
3) When the aforementioned scenerios are at play, coupled with a history of numerous court delays and the affects of -the covid- 19 pandemic/ - "how can this not be considered an "extraordinary circumstance"that warrants Equitable Tolling?
How can a defendant be deemed not to have 'Been pursuing his rights dilligently,' when he is actively litigating 3 cases simultaneously that are all intrisicly related to one another?