No. 22-5983
Cordavia Daniels v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553(a) age-consideration criminal-appeal criminal-sentencing fifth-circuit mitigating-factors sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review substantive-reasonableness
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether the Fifth Circuit erred by affirming the district court's consideration of Cordavia's age and mitigating factors.
II. Whether the Fifth Circuit affirmed a substantively unreasonable sentence.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth Circuit erred by affirming the district court's consideration of Cordavia's age and mitigating factors
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 5, 2022)
Attorneys
Cordavia Daniels
Michael Scott Davis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent