Whether the admission of evidence of prior alleged conduct similar to the crime on trial and dismissed by a grand jury, which was noticed for one purpose under Rule 404(b) and admitted without notice for another purpose, violated the Federal Rules of Evidence and Petitioner's constitutional rights to a fair trial and due process of law, and whether its admission should have been reviewed de novo?

Whether the admission of evidence of prior alleged conduct similar to the crime on trial and dismissed by a grand jury, which was noticed for one purpose under Rule 404(b) and admitted without notice for another purpose, violated the Federal Rules of Evidence and the petitioner's constitutional rights to a fair trial and due process of law