1) DID THE TRIAL A PROSECUTOR USED FALSE AND MISLEADING TESTIMONY, USED FALSE INFLAMMATORY QUESTIONS, AND SOLICITED FALSE TESTIMONY IN COMMITTING FUNDAMENTAL ERROR IN VIOLATION OF A DEFENDANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL, AND TO DUE PROCESS.

2) WHETHER BEING A MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE AT A CONFERENCE IS SUFFICIENT TO QUALIFY A LOWER COURT AS AN APPELLATE JUDGE AND WHETHER SUBSEQUENT TESTIMONY RULES ABOUT OR RULE 762(C) AND/OR A DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL, AND TO DUE PROCESS VIOLATES.

3) WHETHER THE COLLATERAL ATTACK PROCESS SHOULD ALLOW A SANCTION OF PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT COME DOWN SO WOULD BECOME EVIDENCE NOT ENTERED AT TRIAL BUT AVAILABLE TO THE PROSECUTOR FILED.

4) CONDUCT A PROSECUTION AT TRIAL USING EVIDENCE THE STATE ALLOWED AGAINST BEFORE THE COURT IMPARTIAL RULING, WAS FAIRLY ALLOWED AND SUCH SANCTION LOPE THE JUDGE LACKED IMPARTIAL INSTRUCTION UNDER MISSAL LOPES THE STATUTE OF GUILT BY APPEAL AND TO ONES EQUALS ANOTHER THAN A REASON.

5) WHETHER ANY OF THE ISSUES HEARD GIVE THIS COURT CAUSE TO REVERSE AND TO REMAND PETITIONER'S CONVICTION CASE.

Whether a prosecutor who misrepresents witness testimony, asks false leading questions, and solicits false testimony has committed a fundamental error, in violation of a defendant's constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial, and to due process