1. The state failure to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the petitioner used coercion where there was no evidence that NC communicated lack of consent or that the petitioner did anything coercive. The due process clauses of the United States Constitutions require the state to "each element of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

2. The district court abuse its discretion by admitting NC"s out-of-court statements as prior consistent statements where the statements were not consistent with her trial testimony and the error substantially affected the verdict

3. The district court prejudicially err by admitting evidence of the petitioner's bad character relating to hiis.sd..C:a-i,Le;d anger issues, failed to show any evidence that the petitioner had arm anger issue that is against woman.prove the state

The state failure to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the petitioner used coercion