No. 22-5963
Russell Spain v. Shenese Jones
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-authority custody custody-dispute federal-law federal-law-violation judicial-jurisdiction national-security procedural-compliance rule-10
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2023-03-03
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1- Did the lower Courts (Kings County Family Court, Supreme Court of the
State of New York Appellate Division Second Judicial Department) preside
within the scope of the authority of the United States Constitution?
2- Did the lower court violate federal law towards the petitioner?
3- Are these unconstitutional practices an issue of National security?
4- Does this Writ comply in pursuant to Rule 10
5- Are there grounds for federal law violation as a defense in this matter?
6- Is this matter about custody or is there hidden parameters involved?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the lower courts preside within the scope of the United States Constitution?
Docket Entries
2023-03-06
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
2023-02-01
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-28
Waiver of right of respondent Shenese Jones to respond filed.
2022-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 1, 2022)
Attorneys
Russell Spain
Russell Spain — Petitioner
Shenese Jones
Shernese Jones — Respondent