No. 22-5937

Prince Jones v. District of Columbia, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2022-10-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: article-iii civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-power due-process government-accountability judicial-jurisdiction standing statutory-jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Can D.C. Superior Court Judges exercise statutory jurisdiction under the color of Article III judicial power when Article III does not provide a statutory jurisdiction?

2. Can D.C. Superior Court Judges exercise statutory jurisdiction over [petitioner] personally when petitioner is not a statutory person (i.e. people) under the Common Law and Article III judicial power does not provide a statutory jurisdiction?

3. Can Superior Court Judges and the government conceal its defective jurisdiction, its Article III stance and the true codice and cause of action against and in judgments be lawful and binding?

4. Can Congress deposit Article III legislative power into a non-Constitutional entity (U Council) and social deposit not be in violation of Article I (Section 8 clause exclusive legislation clause over the District)?

5. Can petitioner apply his individual Tenth Amendment right to give petitioner state government of the IPC Corporation Council and mayor who enact Article CODE undocumented Congress or Senate?

6. Is petitioner entitled to recover damages from [investigator] under it has been determined by D.C. Court of Appeals that the government violated petitioner's Fourth Amendment right?

7. Is petitioner entitled to recover compensation and damages from the government who seized without warrant petitioner's inside property and then forfeited it without political without due process of law, before hearing or compensation?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can D.C. Superior Court Judges exercise Statutory Jurisdiction under the color of Article III judicial Power, when Article III does not provide a Statutory Jurisdiction

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-21
Waiver of right of respondent Jodi Steiger Lazarus to respond filed.
2022-11-01
Waiver of right of respondents District of Columbia to respond filed.
2022-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 28, 2022)

Attorneys

District of Columbia
Caroline Sage Van ZileAttorney General for the District of Columbia, Respondent
Jodi Steiger Lazarus
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Prince Jones
Prince Jones — Petitioner