I. Did the district court abuse its discretion in applying the 4-level enhancement
for transporting an unaccompanied minor under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(4) ?

II. Did the government establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Mr.
Cordova-Briseno transported unaccompanied minors?

III. Did the district court improperly apply a "strict liability" standard, rather than
considering whether it was reasonably foreseeable that a minor would be
involved in the offense?

IV. Did the Fifth Circuit wrongly conclude that the enhancement lacked a scienter
requirement?

Did the district court abuse its discretion in applying the 4-level enhancement for transporting an unaccompanied minor under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(4)?