1.) DID THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT VIOLATE PETITIONER'S
SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS; TO INCLUDE HIS RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL, HIS RIGHT TO
DUE PROCESS OF LAW, AND HIS RIGHT TO DISCOVERY! UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 16 AND FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 702, 703, AND 705;
WHEN THE COURT ALLOWED A FEDERAL RULE OF' CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 16 VIOLATION
TO GO UNCORRECTED AND DISMISSED THE CLAIM AS HARMLESS ERROR?

2.) DID THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT; WHEN DENYING
PETITIONER'S CLAIM ON APPEAL, ENTER A DECISION IN CONFLICT WITH ITS OWN
PRECEDENT, IN CONFLICT WITH ITS SISTER CIRCUITS, AND IN CONCLIFT WITH LAW;
NAMELY FEDERAL RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 16 AND FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE
702, 703, AND 705?

3.) DID THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT'S RULING ABOVE SET A PRECEDENT; NOT ONLY AFFECTING
DEFENDANTS IN THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, BUT ALSO POTENTIALLY INFECTIONG OTHER
CIRCUITS; THAT WILL ALLOW!THE COURTS TO VIOLATE A DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO A
FAOR TRIAL, TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW, AND TO DISCOVERY IN VIOLATION OF LAW
THAT' REQUIRES THIS COURT'S INTERVENTION AND REVERSAL?

Did the court of appeals violate the petitioner's rights to a fair trial, due process, and discovery?