1. Reasonable jurists would determine that the evidence presented during trial was insufficient to convict Doucet of Aggravated Rape beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia; Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

2. Reasonable jurists could conclude that Mr. Doucet was deprived of effective assistance of counsel when: (A) Trial counsel failed to obtain Medical Expert to rebut State's Expert testimony; (B) Trial counsel failed to investigate Brady material; and, (C) Trial counsel failed to interview witnesses.

Insufficient evidence to convict beyond reasonable doubt