WHETHER THE STATE APPELLATE COURTS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONALLY FORCING
THE PLAINTIFF AND SIMILARLY?: SITUATED CITIZENS UNDER THE CONTROL
OF NATIONAL PRIVATE CORPORATION LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
TO BE SUBJECTED TO SYSTEMIC OUTRAGEOUS CONDUCT AND INTENTIONAL
INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS USED TO EXTORT THEM INTO ACCEPTING
FEDERAL MEDICARE SETASIDE AGREEMENTS IN LIEU OF THEIR PAYMENT
OF FUTURE MEDICALS,THUS ELIMINATING AND STRIKING ANY CAUSE OF ACTION
. FOR SUCH BEHAVIOR AND VIOLATING DUE PROCESS ,EQUAL PROTECTION,AND
AN OPPORTUNITY TO A JURY,THEREFORE BLOCKING THE CITIZENS ACCESS
TO JUSTICE.

Whether state appellate courts are unconstitutionally forcing plaintiffs to be subjected to systemic misconduct by a private corporation